
Frame.io is a cloud-hosted video review and collaboration platform targeted at production and post-production teams. It provides a centralized workspace where editors, producers, clients, and stakeholders can upload video and media files, leave timecode-accurate comments, compare versions, and approve assets without exchanging large files by email. The service emphasizes secure sharing, visual feedback, and integration with editing tools so teams can shorten review cycles and maintain a clear audit trail of decisions.
Frame.io stores high-resolution masters and generates streaming proxies for web review, supports visual annotations directly on frames, and tracks version history along with approval status and metadata. Because it is optimized for iterative creative review, it includes features such as side-by-side comparisons, A/B version playback, burn-in timecode, and downloadable review links with optional security controls.
Organizations use Frame.io to remove friction from review cycles: it reduces the need for repeated exports, consolidates feedback in one place, and keeps creative and production teams aligned on deliverables and deadlines. The platform is commonly deployed by post houses, advertising agencies, corporate video teams, and independent filmmakers who need to coordinate feedback among geographically dispersed reviewers.
Frame.io combines asset management, review tools, and integrations to support the full creative review workflow.
Frame.io hosts and streams uploaded media so teams can review high-resolution video without sharing large files directly. It converts uploaded masters into web-optimized proxies so reviewers can scrub, comment, and mark exact frames in a browser or mobile app. The platform stores version history and enables side-by-side comparisons so teams can see incremental changes and select approved cuts.
It also provides project-level organization (folders and projects), granular user and folder permissions, watermarking options for secure previews, and shareable review links with configurable expiry and access controls. For production pipelines, Frame.io supports automated transcodes, metadata tagging, and comment export so feedback can be integrated back into editing timelines.
Additional collaborative features include real-time notifications, threaded replies to comments, drawn annotations, downloadable review PDFs that summarize comments and timecodes, and a centralized activity log to track who commented, approved, or uploaded each asset.
Frame.io offers these pricing plans:
These plan names map to common tiers for collaborative review platforms; Frame.io also offers custom enterprise contracts, per-seat or pooled storage models, and add-ons for storage overages and dedicated support. Check Frame.io's current pricing tiers (https://www.frame.io/pricing) for the latest rates and enterprise options.
Frame.io offers these pricing plans:
The platform often provides annual billing discounts, pooled storage configurations for teams, and optional add-ons such as extra storage, priority support, and extended retention policies. For the most accurate and current plan details and promotional offers, see Frame.io's current pricing tiers (https://www.frame.io/pricing).
Frame.io starts at $0/month for the Free Plan. Paid plans typically start around $15/month per user for entry-level team features when billed monthly. Mid-tier collaborative plans that include more storage, advanced permissions, and integrations commonly fall in the $20–$30/month per user range depending on storage allocation and whether billing is monthly or annual.
Frame.io costs approximately $150–$300/year per user for most paid plans when billed annually, depending on tier and storage choices. Annual billing frequently lowers the effective monthly cost, and enterprise contracts are priced separately based on storage, seat count, and required SLAs.
Frame.io pricing ranges from $0 (free) to $30+/month per user. Core factors that affect the final cost are storage needs, number of active collaborators, frequency of uploads and downloads, and whether you require enterprise features like SSO, HIPAA support, or a dedicated account manager. For teams that process large volumes of high-resolution footage, storage add-ons or negotiated enterprise plans are common.
Frame.io is used to centralize the creative review and approval process for video and media projects. Teams upload source files and masters to a shared workspace where reviewers can play back footage, leave frame-accurate comments, draw onscreen annotations, and compare versions. By capturing feedback directly on the media and linking it to timecodes, Frame.io reduces ambiguity in notes and eliminates the need for repeated exported review files.
Production teams use Frame.io for collaborative dailies review, remote editorial feedback, client approvals, and version control. The platform’s integration with editing software allows editors to import comments and apply timecoded notes back into their timelines, which speeds up revisions and reduces context switching between review and editing environments.
Beyond post-production, Frame.io is employed for asset distribution and secure client previews. Shareable review links with watermarks, password protection, and expiry controls let teams distribute cuts to external stakeholders while protecting content. Organizational features like project folders, metadata, and permission controls help larger teams manage many concurrent projects and maintain an audit trail for approvals.
Personal Use: Independent creators use Frame.io to collect feedback from collaborators and clients without FTP or cumbersome file exchanges.
Team Features: Production teams rely on centralized comments, version comparison, and editing integrations to shorten revision cycles and keep stakeholders aligned.
Security and Compliance: Teams with higher security needs can opt for enterprise controls such as SSO and custom retention policies.
Frame.io offers a feature set focused on reducing friction in video review, but like any specialized platform it has trade-offs to consider.
Pros:
Cons:
Operational considerations include deciding between per-seat vs pooled-storage billing models, establishing naming/version conventions to keep projects organized, and planning for backups or archival strategies outside Frame.io for long-term master storage.
Frame.io commonly offers a free tier or trial that allows teams to test core review and collaboration features before committing to a paid plan. The free option is useful for individual editors or small teams that want to evaluate how visual feedback and review links fit into their existing workflow without immediate expense.
Trials typically include basic upload capability, review link creation, and a sample of annotation and commenting features. For teams evaluating the platform, a short trial period allows measurement of how review cycles shorten in practice and whether native editor integrations improve revision turnaround.
If you plan to evaluate Frame.io, prepare representative media (a typical project or two), invite reviewers who will mimic the real approval flow, and test integrations with your preferred NLE (non-linear editor). The outcome will help determine if the team should opt for a paid tier with more storage, advanced permissions, and SSO.
Yes, Frame.io offers a free tier that provides limited storage and basic review functionality intended for individuals or evaluation purposes. The free tier is useful for testing timecode comments, shareable links, and the web/mobile review experience, but it typically lacks the storage, team controls, and enterprise security features of paid plans.
Frame.io provides a developer-facing API and webhook system to integrate its core capabilities into production pipelines and third-party systems. The API is RESTful, supports OAuth authentication, and exposes endpoints for uploading assets, listing projects and folders, retrieving comments and annotations, and managing users and permissions. This allows studios to automate ingestion, sync metadata with editorial systems, and trigger downstream processes such as transcoding or archiving.
Webhooks enable real-time notifications for events like asset uploads, comments added, or approvals completed; these can be consumed by CI/CD style automation or custom backend services that keep editorial dashboards and downstream systems synchronized. Many teams use webhooks to push Frame.io events into project management systems or to trigger automated transcode workflows on cloud render farms.
In addition to raw REST endpoints, Frame.io has SDKs and helper libraries in common languages (for example JavaScript/Node and Python) that simplify tasks such as multipart uploads and resumable transfers for large media files. Developers can also build custom upload clients to integrate with studio DAMs, LTO archiving systems, or content pipelines.
Because Frame.io integrates closely with editing applications, it also supports plug-in and extension points for NLEs (notably Adobe Premiere and After Effects) so that comments can be pulled into timelines and markers can be generated automatically. For full developer documentation and API references, consult Frame.io's API documentation (https://developer.frame.io/) which provides endpoint details, example requests, and webhook schemas.
Frame.io occupies a specific niche in video review and collaboration. The following alternatives cover similar capabilities for review, asset sharing, and collaborative approvals.
When choosing an alternative, compare features like timecode-accurate comments, version comparison, integration with your NLE, storage model (pooled vs per-seat), security/compliance features, and the flexibility of API/webhooks for automation.
Frame.io is used for video review, collaboration, and approval. Teams upload footage and share streaming proxies so stakeholders can leave timecode-accurate comments and visual annotations, compare versions, and approve cuts without exchanging large files. The workflow reduces back-and-forth exports and centralizes feedback directly on media.
Yes, Frame.io provides native integration with Adobe Premiere Pro. The integration allows editors to import comments and markers from Frame.io directly into their timelines, open Frame.io-hosted assets from the NLE, and push sequences for review without leaving the editing environment.
Frame.io starts at $0/month for a free tier and paid plans generally begin around $15/month per user for entry-level team functionality when billed monthly, with mid-tier plans in the $20–$30/month range depending on storage and feature needs. Enterprise pricing is customized for large organizations.
Yes, Frame.io offers a free tier that provides limited storage and basic review features suitable for individuals and evaluation purposes. The free tier lacks the storage capacity and advanced team features of paid plans.
Yes, Frame.io is commonly used for client approvals. Shareable review links, password protection, time-limited access, and burn-in watermarking allow teams to deliver review copies securely to clients and capture approvals and signature milestones in the review timeline.
Yes, Frame.io supports frame-accurate comments and annotations. Reviewers can drop comments tied to specific frames or timecodes, draw on the image, and reply in threaded conversations, which makes feedback precise and actionable for editors.
Yes, Frame.io offers integrations with Slack. Notifications about uploads, approvals, and comments can be routed into Slack channels, helping teams stay informed about review progress without constantly switching interfaces.
Frame.io provides multiple security features suitable for confidential work. These include access controls, expiring share links, password-protected review links, watermarking, and enterprise options such as single sign-on (SSO) and audit logs. Organizations with strict compliance needs can negotiate enhanced controls under enterprise agreements.
Yes, comments and markers from Frame.io can be imported into supported NLEs. Native integrations, particularly with Adobe Premiere Pro, allow editors to pull timecode comments and markers into timelines so feedback can be applied directly during editing.
Yes, Frame.io exposes a REST API and webhooks for automation and integrations. The API enables programmatic uploads, metadata synchronization, user and project management, and retrieval of comments and version history; webhooks provide event-driven notifications for building automated workflows or syncing with other production systems.
Frame.io is part of the Adobe organization and positions typically span product engineering, product management, customer success, and industry partnerships. Job listings and career information are posted on the broader Adobe careers site and the Frame.io company pages; roles often require experience with media workflows, cloud services, or video technologies.
Frame.io does not widely advertise a public affiliate program for general referral marketing in the same way consumer SaaS platforms do. Partnerships and reseller relationships are typically handled through Adobe’s partner programs and enterprise partnership channels. For referral or reseller opportunities, contact sales via Frame.io's official site or the Adobe partner portal.
To evaluate user feedback and reviews, check professional review sites and industry forums that cover production and post tools. Useful sources include software review aggregators, industry-specific publications focused on filmmaking and post-production, and the customer review sections on Frame.io's product pages. For the most current and balanced perspectives, read both user-submitted reviews and case studies from agencies who publish workflow details on Frame.io integrations.